The
Continuity Equation
In various earlier lectures, we have discussed how expectation values
such as depend on time.
In this lecture, we investigate how the probability density depends on time . This question leads us to introduce
the probability current ,
which measures the flow of probability and prove the continuity equation
This important equation expresses the idea that probability
cannot be created and destroyed but flows from one region to the next.
This is known as the local conservation of probability. It is an
important concept when we come to discuss scattering and tunneling in
the following chapters.
The Continuity Equation
The probability density and the probability current density satisfy an equation known as the ‘‘continuity equation''.
Our starting point is the probability density We
would like to understand how the probability density depends on time
. Let us therefore first recall
Schrödinger’s equation for the wave function and its complex conjugate,
where we recall that the potential is a real analytic function. We can
now compute the time derivative of the probability density, Note that the dependence on the potential cancels out between the two terms
and the remainder becomes where the symbol , is known as the “probability current density”. The
result is known as the “continuity equation”.
Physical Interpretation
Physically, the continuity equation expresses that a change of the probability contained in a given region is due to probability flowing in or out of the region through the boundaries.
To understand the physical interpretation of and the continuity equation it is
convenient to integrate it over an interval. Let us define to
be the probability to find the particle in the interval . The time derivative of
this probability can be expressed in terms of the probability current at
the boundaries of the interval,
This has the following interpretation:
is the rate that
probability is “flowing” from left to right at .
The rate of change of the probability to find the particle in the
interval is equal to
the rate that probability is flowing in at the boundaries and .
Put simply, this expresses the conservation of probability:
probability cannot be created or destroyed but flows from one region to
the next.
It is illuminating to consider the following limits:
Sending and
, the equation becomes
since if the wave function is normalizable
then and hence
as . We therefore recover
the conservation of the total probability to find the probability. In
particular, if the wave function is normalised at , this will remain normalised for . This is an important property
that you proved in one of the problems in the chapter where we first
introduced the Schrödinger’s equation.
Setting and we find In the limit , we recover the continuity equation ,
which therefore expresses the local conservation of probability in the
neighbourhood of the point .
Example: Stationary Wave functions
Normalisable stationary wave functions have vanishing probability current density: no probability flows in or out of any given region.
Let us consider a stationary wave function, The probability density and
current are independent of time, The continuity equation tells us that and therefore is constant. Furthermore, if
is square-normalizable then
as . However, if
is constant, then it must vanish .
As an explicit example, suppose we have a Hamiltonian eigenfunction
in the infinite potential well , for some . Since is a real function, as required.
In fact, square-normalizable Hamiltonian eigenfunctions can always be
chosen real (up to a constant phase) and this argument is completely
general. It provides another proof of for a square-normalisable stationary solution.
Example: Sum of Two Stationary Wave functions
Sums of normalisable stationary wave functions can have interference, leading to probability density flowing in or out of a region. The probability current density for such sums is typically not zero.
Now consider the normalized sum of two stationary wave functions,
where we assume the Hamiltonian eigenfunctions , are normalized and real with
energy eigenvalues , . Introducing the frequency the
probability current is The probability current therefore oscillates in
time with frequency .
Example: Plane Waves
For (non-normalisable) plane waves, which we will use for scattering problems, the probability current density is proportional to the velocity of the wave.
Now consider the stationary plane wave solution for a free particle
on a line, where . The probability density and current are constant Note that the probability current is equal to the
probability density multiplied by the velocity of the wave. This is consistent with
the continuity equation. It evades the statement that for a stationary wave function
because it is not square-normalisable.
Despite the fact that they are not square-normalizable, plane wave
solutions are useful in “scattering problems” in quantum mechanics. This
will be the starting point for the next lecture.
Problems
- Interpretation of the probability current:
Let be the probability
to find the particle in the interval .
Write down a definite integral for .
Write down the continuity equation and use it to show that
Hence discuss the physical interpretation of .
Solution ▶
The probability to find the particle in the interval is
We compute the derivative with respect to time and use the
continuity equation
This equation represents the conservation of probability: the
rate of change of the probability to find the particle in the region
, is equal to the rate
the probability is flowing in / out at the boundaries and .
- Stationary probability current:
Consider a stationary solution of Schrödinger’s equation,
Write down an expression for the probability density and show that it is independent of
.
Write down an expression for the probability current and show that it is independent of
.
Using the continuity equation and part (a), show that is also independent of .
Hence explain why
if is
square-normalizable.
Solution ▶
For a stationary wavefunction, the probability density is
which is independent of time.
For a stationary wavefunction, the probability current is
which is independent of time.
The continuity equation is From
part (a), we find
and therefore the probability current is also independent of
position.
For a square-normalizable wavefunction, and therefore as . Since is independent of position, everywhere.
- Probability current in an infinite potential well:
Consider an infinite potential well .
By integrating the continuity equation over , explain why
Show that the standard boundary conditions on the wavefunction
at and imply the stronger conditions
What is the physical interpretation of these results?
Solution ▶
From the continuity equation , the
time-derivative of the total probability to find the particle anywhere
in is For the
conservation of the total probability we therefore require for all .
The standard boundary condition for the infinite-square well
is
We do not set the spatial derivative of the wavefunction to vanish at
because the potential jumps
by an infinite amount there. Nevertheless, from the definition of the
probability current we find This is stronger than the condition from part (a).
Intuitively, the probability to find the particle in the regions and is zero, so there should not be
any probability flowing into or our of these regions.
TUTORIAL 4
Time-dependence of the probability current
Consider the infinite potential well with wavefunction
Show that the probability current has the form where and is a constant.
Show that What is the physical interpretation of this result?
Sketch the probability current at times
In which direction is the probability “flowing" when
Compare this to a sketch of the expectation value where . Is it consistent?
Hint 1: For part (a), you may assume the result from section 16.5
of the lecture notes.
Hint 2: For part (a), you may use the trigonometric identity
Solution ▶
In the section “Example: Sum of Two Stationary Wave
functions”, we derived the following formula for the probability current
of a sum of Hamiltonian eigenfunctions of energies and , where . In the present
case, and hence
using the hint.
It is clear that since . The physical explanation is that the wavefunction vanishes
for and so there cannot be any probability
flowing into / out of these regions.
The sequence of sketches is

For , so the probability is flowing to
the right.
For ,
so the probability is
flowing to the left.
Let us compare this to the sketch below of the expectation
value where .

We see that whenever
the position expectation value is moving to the right and vice verse, as
expected.