1.1. Lecture 1
1.1.1. Definition of a representation
Let be a field (we will almost always take ), and let be a group.
Definition 1.1.1.
A representation of over is a pair , where
-
(i)
is a vector space over , and
-
(ii)
is a group homomorphism.
We also say that is a representation of on , or simply that is a representation of ; this makes sense since the vector space is part of the definition of .
The dimension of a representation is the dimension of . We will often denote this by .
There is another way to think of this. Suppose that is a representation of . Then we may define an action of on by letting
for all and . This is an action because is a homomorphism, and it is linear, meaning that for every the map taking is a linear map on . Conversely, given a linear action of on , we can define a representation of by . In other words:
A representation of is a linear action on a vector space.
Suppose that is a representation of a group and . By choosing a basis for , we may identify with , and under this identification any (invertible) linear map is just the same thing as an (invertible) matrix.
Thus, once you choose a basis, a representation is just the same as a homomorphism . In particular:
A 1-dimensional representation of is a homomorphism .
1.1.2. Examples
Example 1.1.2.
If is any vector space, then we can always take to be the homomorphism sending every element to the identity. We call this the trivial representation of on .
Example 1.1.3.
Let . Recall that there is a homomorphism
taking a permutation to its sign. Since , this gives a 1-dimensional representation of , called the sign representation.
Example 1.1.4.
Suppose that . Then, if is a representation of , it is completely determined by and the invertible linear map (which may be any element of ). This is because we then have
Thus, a representation of is just a vector space together with an invertible linear map from to itself.
We can push this a bit further. Suppose that is a cyclic group of order with generator , hence
A representation of is once again determined by and , which can be any linear map such that .
Many interesting examples arise from geometry.
Example 1.1.5.
Let be the dihedral group of order , the group of symmetries (rotations and reflections) of a regular -gon. Since each rotation/reflection is an invertible linear map from , we get a representation of on . Letting be counter-clockwise rotation by radians and be reflection in the horizontal axis, recall that has the presentation
As an explicit homomorphism , we have
where . Since , we may also view this as a representation of on ; we call the defining representation of .
Example 1.1.6.
Let . You might remember that this is isomorphic to the group of symmetries (rotations/reflections) of the regular tetrahedron in . We therefore get a representation
It would be a slightly unpleasant exercise to work the matrices out explicitly.
Note that is also isomorphic to the group of rotations of the cube, giving another (different!) 3-dimensional representation.
Another source of representations comes from actions of groups on (usually finite) sets.
Example 1.1.7.
Define a representation of via
where is the standard basis. This is called the permutation representation of on .
Important: If we write elements of as (as we commonly do), then it is not the case that
This actually would define a right action, not a left action. The correct formula is
This may be generalised whenever we have a group action on a set. Firstly, we associate to any set an -vector space:
Definition 1.1.8.
Let be a set. The free vector space over generated by is the vector space consisting of all formal sums
where and for all but finitely many . The vector space operations are as follows: vector addition is given by
and scalar multiplication
for all .
Observe that a basis for is (here , i.e. the formal sum , with if and otherwise)
Definition 1.1.9.
Given a group acting on a set , we define the permutation representation for this action by
1.1.3. Exercises
Remark 1.1.10.
We elaborate on two ways of checking whether a map is actually a representation. This point was discussed a bit during the lecture, but since it will be used frequently throughout the course, I would like to emphasise this a bit further:
(i) Assume that a rule or formula is given for for every . In order to verify that really is a representation, one needs to either check or show that for all .
(ii) Often, we will define by where it sends the generators of a group . Since every element of can be written as a word in , if is required to be a homomorphism, then there is no choice in the values of for the other group elements : must be the product of the s corresponding to the decomposition of into a product of s. In order for this procedure to give a well-defined homomorphism on all of , it is both necessary and sufficient that the s satisfy the same relations as the s. (This is a general fact about any group homomorphism, not just ones into ).
Problem 12. Verify that is a representation of , where is defined via
Problem 13. Writing , let be given by
Show that this defines a representation of .
Problem 14.
-
(a)
Find the matrices of all the elements of for the permutation representation , with respect to the basis .
-
(b)
Find another basis such that the matrices all take the form
and determine the unknown entries for your basis.
Problem 15. Let and be two representations of a group . Show that is a representation of , where
Remark: this is called the (direct) sum of two representations.
Problem 16. Let be a representation of a group . Given a subgroup , show that is a representation of .
Problem 17. Given a group action , let .
a) Show that is a representation of , where for every and , is defined via the formula
b) Show that is not a representation of , where for every and , is defined via the formula
Problem 18. Prove the following:
Proposition 1.1.11.
Let be a finite group and a representation of . Show that for every , there exists such that
Problem 19. Find all 1-dimensional representations of .