1.6. Lecture 6
1.6.1. The group algebra and the regular representation
Let be a finite group. Recall (cf. Definition 1.1.8) that we defined the free vector space to be the vector space of formal sums
where all , with vector addition and scalar multiplication given by
The group multiplication lets us define a multiplication operation on :
Definition 1.6.1.
Let be a finite group. The free vector space equipped with the multiplication rule defined above is called the group algebra (or ) of .
Example 1.6.2.
Let and be elements of . Then
Remark 1.6.3.
A vector space over a field with a multiplication rule “” that satisfies
-
(i)
-
(ii)
-
(iii)
for all and is called an algebra. Note that one does not require to be associative however we will only consider algebras with an associative product. Examples of algebras include with the cross product, the space of all polynomials with coefficients in with multiplication being pointwise multiplication of polynomials, and for any vector space with multiplication being composition of linear maps.
The formal sums form a basis of , hence .
Any representation of gives rise to an algebra homomorphism from to , which we also denote as :
Remark 1.6.4.
For many this is the definition of representation of a finite group that they use, in other words an algebra homomorphism from the group algebra to a vector space. This is because this definition can be extended to general algebra, not just group algebras (see Problem 1.6.8).
Recall also that we have the permutation representation of on (Definition 1.1.9); in this case we normally denote this by , and call it the regular representation, i.e.
Theorem 1.6.5.
Let be any representation of . Then there is an isomorphism of vector spaces
Equivalently, .
The proof of this is short, but can be difficult to wrap your head around. The idea is to provide a recipe to turn a -homomorphism into an element of , and a recipe to turn an element of into a -homomorphism , and check that these recipes are inverse to each other.
Proof.
If is a -homomorphism, define
Conversely, given , let be the linear map defined by
you can check that is indeed a -homomorphism (see Exercise 1.6.2).
We claim that the maps and are linear maps between and that are 2-sided inverses of each other, so these vector spaces are isomorphic. It is clear that they are linear maps. We must check that
and
for all , .
-
(i)
Let . Then
as required.
-
(ii)
Let and define . We wish to show that . To do this, we evaluate at the basis vectors . Since and are linear, if they agree on a basis, then they are the same:
since is a -homomorphism. ∎
This has a beautiful consequence: the sum of the squares of the dimensions of the irreducible representations is equal to the order of the group. We write for the set of isomorphism classes of irreducible representations of .
Theorem 1.6.6.
-
(i)
Every irreducible representation of is a constituent of the regular representation with multiplicity . In other words,
(here ; times).
-
(ii)
(Sum of squares formula.) We have
where the sum runs over the isomorphism classes of irreducible representations of . In particular, is finite.
Proof.
- (i)
-
(ii)
This follows from equating dimensions on both sides of the first part and noting that . ∎
1.6.2. Exercises
Problem 37. Verify that the sum of squares formula holds for dihedral groups.
Problem 38. Fill in the following details from the proof of Theorem 1.6.5:
-
(a)
Verify that is linear.
-
(b)
Verify that is linear.
-
(c)
Show that for every , is a -homomorphism, that is
(hence ).
Problem 39. Decompose into irreducible subrepresentations.
Problem 40. Show the following:
Theorem 1.6.7.
If every irreducible representation of a finite group is 1-dimensional, then is Abelian.
Hint: Consider the representation . Show that , and thus is isomorphic to . Use Theorem 1.6.6 to show that there is a basis of for which the matrices of all are diagonal, hence is Abelian.
Theorem 1.6.8.
A finite group is Abelian if and only if all its irreducible representations are 1-dimensional.
Problem 41. Let be an algebra over . An -module, or algebra representation of is a pair , where is a -vector space and is such that
In an analogous manner to group representations, a subspace is said to define a submodule of if for all , , and is said to be irreducible if it has no non-trivial submodules.
-
(a)
Show Schur’s lemma for irreducible algebra-modules: if is a finite dimensional irreducible algebra module and is such that
for all , then .
-
(b)
Show that is an irreducible representation of a group if and only if is an irreducible -module.
Problem 42. Let be an algebra, and define . This set is called the centre of .
-
(a)
Show that is a subalgebra of .
-
(b)
Compute .
-
(c)
Show that if is an irreducible -module, then there exists a homomorphism of commutative algebras such that
for all .