1.2. Lecture 2
1.2.1. Subrepresentations and irreducible representations
Definition 1.2.1.
A subrepresentation of a representation of is a pair consisting of a subspace such that for all together with the group homomorphism
for all .
Definition 1.2.2.
A representation of is irreducible if it is non-zero and has no subrepresentations except for and itself.
Example 1.2.3.
Since 1-dimensional vector spaces have no non-trivial subspaces, every 1-dimensional representation is irreducible.
Example 1.2.4.
Consider the permutation representation of . This is the representation which acts on via , where are the standard basis vectors. It is not irreducible!
Let . Then for every , so is a subrepresentation of . Being 1-dimensional, it is in fact an irreducible subrepresentation.
Denote by the subspace of consisting of all vectors such that . Then since permutes the coordinates of a vector, it doesn’t change their sum; so , and is a subrepresentation (of dimension 2).
We claim that is irreducible. Indeed, suppose that is a non-zero subrepresentation; we have to show that . Let be non-zero. As can’t happen, we can apply an element of to permute the coordinates so that . Then applying , we have . Taking the difference, ; scaling, . Applying , we have . But these vectors span (e.g. because they are linearly independent and ), so as required.
Example 1.2.5.
If is a finite-dimensional representation of , with , then has an eigenvector which spans a 1-dimensional subrepresentation of . Thus is not irreducible unless . The irreducible subrepresentations of are exactly the lines spanned by -eigenvectors.
1.2.2. Homomorphisms and isomorphisms
Definition 1.2.6.
Suppose that and are representations of . Then a -homomorphism (or homomorphism of representations of , or map of representations of , or, if we are being lazy, just a homomorphism) is a linear map such that
for all , .
In other words, “commutes” with the action of . We write for the (vector space) of -homomorphisms from to .
There is another word that is sometimes used for -homomorphism: intertwiner, or -intertwiner.
Definition 1.2.7.
A -isomorphism (or just an isomorphism) is a bijective -homomorphism.
If and are two representations of a group , and there exists a -isomorphism then we write , and say that they are isomorphic. The collection of all representations isomorphic to a representation is called the isomorphism class of .
Lemma 1.2.8.
Suppose that and are representations of . If is an isomorphism, then .
Proof.
Exercise. ∎
Isomorphic representations are “different pictures of the same object”; if and are isomorphic, with begin a -isomorphism, then we have
for all , i.e. and tells us everything about .
Lemma 1.2.9.
Let and be two representations of a group . If , then and are subrepresentations of and , respectively.
Proof.
We know from linear algebra that and are subspaces, so we just have to show that they are preserved by the -actions.
For the kernel: suppose that . Then , and so for any , we have
so . Thus is -invariant, as required.
For the image: suppose that . Then for some . Then for any ,
so the image of is also -invariant. ∎
Example 1.2.10.
Let where the isomorphism takes and . Let be the permutation representation of , so in the basis we have
Let denote the defining representation of ; thus
Let be the linear map defined through
(i.e. maps the basis vectors to the vertices of the equilateral triangle around the origin with a vertex at ). We want to show that is a -homomorphism.
To do this we first consider the matrix of is
We need to show that for all . As is generated by just and we only need to check two cases. We need to check that
which is true, and a similar equation coming from .
The kernel of the homomorphism is the subspace and in fact defines an isomorphism from the subrepresentation
to .
1.2.3. Exercises
Problem 20. Let be a representation of a group . Show that if , are two irreducible subrepresentations of , then either or .
Problem 21. Prove Lemma 1.2.8.
Problem 22. Let be an -dimensional representation of a group . Show that there exists a representation that is isomorphic to .
Problem 23. Generalise Example 1.2.4 to the permutation representation of .
Problem 24. Let
The quasi-regular representation of on is denoted and is defined via the formula
for all , and . This is called the functional point of view. Let be a group acting on a set . Show that , the representation arising from this group action, is isomorphic to .