Compute for equal to , , and (where ).
Let be the elementary matrix with in the -entry and elsewhere. Compute for and .
Let be the -vector space of strictly upper triangular matrices (’s on the diagonal) and let .
In this problem we will see that the restriction of the exponential to is a homeomorphism onto (i.e. a continuous bijection with continuous inverse).
Let . Show that .
Show that for .
Show that, for , the logarithm is in fact a finite sum (and hence converges).
Show that and are inverses of each other. Hint: this boils down to an identity of formal power series, which you can actually deduce from the corresponding fact over .
Using the previous question, fill in the gaps of the proof from the notes that
is surjective.
(+) Is the exponential map surjective? What about ?
Let be a unit vector and let be the map with being rotation by about the axis (the angle is measured anticlockwise as you look along the vector from the origin).
Show that is a one-parameter subgroup and find its infinitesimal generator in terms of .
Prove that the Lie algebra of is
and find its (real) dimension. Is it a complex vector space?
Let , where denotes the identity matrix of size . Let . Let
be the orthogonal group of signature . Let . We let and be their Lie algebras.
Show that the Lie algebra is given by
and that .
Show that the Lie algebras and are isomorphic. (Later on, we will see a conceptual reason for this).
Hint: it is enough to find a basis for and a basis for which satisfy the ‘same’ Lie bracket relations. Try using the basis of consisting of infinitesimal generators for rotations around the axes, and a basis for related to the quaternions.
Show that the Lie algebras and are isomorphic. See Problem 7 for the definition of .
(+) Show that the Lie algebras and are isomorphic (as real Lie algebras). See Problem 7 for the definition of .
Show that:
If , then .
(+) Show that, if , then .
Prove that if is a Lie group and is the connected component of the identity, then the subgroup is normal.
Give a direct proof that is connected, by constructing a path from an arbitrary element of to the identity. Hint: every element of is rotation by some angle about some axis.
Prove by induction on that is connected for all .
Show that a general element of may be written
for with .
Deduce that is homeomorphic to the three-sphere .
In other words, write down a bijection with continuous inverse. Don’t worry about checking that the maps are continuous, just write them down. The result of this problem implies that is simply-connected, because is.
Show that, if is a connected (linear) Lie group with Lie algebra , then is abelian if and only if is (see Definition 1.30). Hint: for the converse, consider the adjoint map .
What goes wrong if is not connected?
Solution: see Proposition 2.14.
If is a Lie algebra, let be its centre:
Suppose that is a connected Lie group with centre and Lie algebra with centre .
Prove that is the Lie algebra of .
You will always have but the reverse inclusion requires that is connected.
Solve the exercises in section 1.8
If is an irreducible finite-dimensional complex representation of and is the centre of (see problem 14), show that there is a linear map such that for all .
For , find . Find when , where is the standard representation and . These representations are in fact irreducible, though we haven’t proved that yet; you can just directly show that exists.
Prove that, for ,
Hence give a direct proof that .
Consider .
For a continuous function on , we define its integral
Note that . Show that
for any .
Let be a finite dimensional representation of and let be any Hermitian form on . Define a new Hermitian form by
Show that is a -invariant Hermitian form on .
Conclude that every finite-dimensional representation of is completely reducible. (This is analogous to Maschke’s theorem for finite groups.)
Consider the orthogonal group .
Show that has index in . Deduce that every element in can be uniquely written as or with and the matrix for rotation by . Show that
Mimic the method we used for dihedral groups to classify all irreducible finite-dimensional representations of .
Solution
Let be the space of functions on that are polynomials in the coordinates and . Consider the (left) action of on given by
(here, think of as a column vector).
Compute the derived action for the “standard” basis of given by , , and . You should get something involving the partial derivatives and .
Let be the standard representation of .
Show that as Lie group representations.
Show that as representations of . (You could just ‘take the derivative’ of part (a), but please do it directly instead.)
Find an explicit homomorphism corresponding to .
Let , be representations of . Let and be two weight vectors of and respectively with respective weights and . Show that
is a weight vector with weight , and that if and are highest weight vectors then so is .
Let be a finite-dimensional representation of .
What are the weights of the dual representation ?
Deduce that .
Let be a finite-dimensional representation of . Consider the Casimir element55 5 Conventions differ; it might be more usual to call the Casimir.
Show commutes with the action of . Conclude that if is irreducible then acts as a scalar.
What is the scalar for , the irreducible representation of highest weight ?
Compute the action of on the space of polynomial functions on , with action the derivative of (see problem 20).
If , show that there is a (possibly infinite dimensional!) representation of with highest weight .
Consider , the irreducible representation of highest weight of . Decompose the following representations into irreducibles, and find highest weight vectors for the irreducible constituents:
;
;
;
.
For the third example, find bases for the irreducible subrepresentations.
For integers, decompose the representation of into irreducibles. (This is known as the Clebsch–Gordan formula).
(+) Can you find a general expression for the highest weight vectors for the irreducible subrepresentations? What about for the weight bases?
Show that the real Lie algebras and are not isomorphic. Hint: consider the adjoint action of an arbitrary element of .
We have that is the irreducible representation of of dimension . Let be its character. Every conjugacy class of contains an element of the form
Show that
Let be an irreducible representation of , and let .
Show that is a scalar.
Show that the restriction of to is irreducible.
Show that for every and integer , there is a unique irreducible representation of of dimension with .
Which of these are derivatives of representations of ? Hence classify the finite dimensional holomorphic irreducible representations of .
Verify the formula
as operators on .
Find the image of the Casimir element from problem 24 under our isomorphism , and compare to part 1.
Let .
Verify that is a highest weight vector in .
By applying the lowering operator, find weight vectors of weights and .
Find a basis of weight vectors in when and (see example 3.40).
Prove that, for ,
Find a similar formula for
Use this to give another proof that
(Hint: if is in the intersection, let , not divisible by ).
Let be the standard — three-dimensional — representation of . Find a basis of weight vectors for , and decompose it into irreducible subrepresentations.
Let be the five-dimensional representation of . Decompose into irreducible representations.
Verify that
and
Consider, instead of , . What are the roots and root spaces? What is the relation between the weights (as linear functionals on ) and between the weights defined in section 3?
Let be the dual of the standard representation, with basis dual to the standard basis.
Show that the are weight vectors with weights .
Find the action of each on and deduce that is a highest weight vector with weight .
Show that if and only if . Must the be integers?
The root lattice is the subgroup of the weight lattice generated by the roots.
Draw a picture showing the root lattice inside the weight lattice.
Show that has index three in (i.e. the quotient has order three).
What would the root lattice and weight lattice be for ? What is the index in this case?
Let be a finite-dimensional irreducible representation of . Show that any two weights of differ by an element of the root lattice.
Find the weights of and draw the weight diagram.
Using weights, or otherwise, show that
where is the trivial representation and is the adjoint representation.
(non-examinable) Let be a representation of . As is simply-connected exponentiates to a representation, , of . Let
Show that, for every weight , is an isomorphism
Here .
Give another proof of Theorem 4.26.
Let be integers. Check that
is a highest weight vector with weight .
Show that, if is a finite-dimensional representation of with a unique highest weight vector (up to scalar multiplication), then is necessarily irreducible.
Deduce that the standard representation, its dual, and the adjoint representation are irreducible.
Find the weights of and draw the weight diagram.
Show that
is a highest weight vector with weight .
Let . Calculate and and show that they are linearly independent.
Show that
and find the weight diagram for .
(harder!) The aim of this problem is to show that, for ,
It suffices to show that is irreducible with highest weight .
Show that has a basis of weight vectors
and that these have distinct weights (so, every weight has multiplicity one).
Show that is the unique highest weight vector in , up to scalar multiplication.
Deduce that is an irreducible representation with highest weight . See problem 44.
(monster!) Let , let , and let . For , define .
Let
be defined by
where means is omitted (and similarly for ).
Show that is an -homomorphism.
Show that has a unique highest weight vector of weight for each , and no other highest weight vectors.
Show that the highest weight vector from the previous part is in if and only if .
Deduce that is the irreducible representation of highest weight .
Show that is surjective, and hence decompose into irreducibles.
Find the dimension of . Find its weights.
This problem is hard! For a solution, see Fulton and Harris, section 13.2, but watch out for the unjustified ’clearly’ just before Claim 13.4.