In contrast, position and momentum appear quite asymmetrically in our
description of quantum mechanics so far. We have introduced a
‘position-space’ wave function \(\psi(x)\) on which position and
momentum act as operators
\begin{align}
\hat x & = x\,, \\[1ex]
\hat p & = - i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \, .
\end{align}
The canonical transformation \((x,p) \to (p,-x)\) from classical mechanics suggests there should another formulation of quantum mechanics with a ‘momentum-space’ wave function \(\widetilde{\psi}(p)\) on which position and momentum act as operators
\begin{align}
\hat x & = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial p}\,, \\[1ex]
\hat p & = p \, .
\end{align}
We claim that the position and momentum wave functions are in fact related by the following pair of integrals
\begin{align}
\psi(x) & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi \hbar}}\int^\infty_{-\infty} {\rm d}p \, \widetilde{\psi}(p) \, e^{ipx/\hbar} \,, \\[1ex]
\widetilde{\psi}(p) & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi \hbar}}\int^\infty_{-\infty} {\rm d}x \, \psi(x) \, e^{-ipx/\hbar} \, .
\end{align}
This is an example of a ‘Fourier transform’.
Let us see that these are consistent with the expected form of the
position and momentum operators above.
The action of position and momentum operators on position and momentum wave functions is summarised in the following table.